|
|
Post by antoine010891 on Oct 19, 2008 16:26:33 GMT
Not a fan of the pistols, nor punk in general. But to be fair I have heard very little by Pistols and only heard a best of by The Clash so I think I'm best off not judging.
|
|
|
|
Post by fastfuse on Nov 7, 2008 20:44:53 GMT
f*ck Joe Strummer.....the cockney c**t!!
|
|
george
Stalker
Yesterday, Today
Posts: 180
|
Post by george on Nov 7, 2008 21:04:16 GMT
Why don't Austrians care whether their lovers are 4, 14 or 40 years old?
Because one size Fritz-all.
|
|
|
|
Post by dontask on Nov 8, 2008 1:11:18 GMT
the difference between ginger people and bricks?
bricks get laid.
|
|
|
|
Post by upton on Nov 8, 2008 10:42:04 GMT
Joe Strummer and The Clash are so much better than the Pistols it's painful.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fergal on Nov 8, 2008 12:04:36 GMT
Aye I know, Pistols are superb but the Clash were ten times better, although had their been no Sex Pistols there would have in no way been the Clash. Strummer would still be messing around with the 101'ers
The Clash took it to the next level though, they were wasted on punk I suppose, the amount of talent stretched across those first three records, and even glimpses of ones after that. Ramones were immense as well, may I add, but were incredibly limited and it became a dated cliché after a few records.
|
|
|
|
Post by cal on Nov 9, 2008 15:13:32 GMT
Ramones become a bit of a self parody really. i mean every album had fucking brilliant songs but there was a load of shit on them aswell.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fergal on Nov 9, 2008 16:08:38 GMT
Nearly all punk became a self parody I suppose, thats why the Clash were good to move on (though their later albums were rubbish) and the Pistols were good to split up and Lydon forming the nearly as good PiL. But by like 81 punk was pretty rubbish, far more exciting things were going on elsewhere
|
|
|
|
Post by cal on Nov 9, 2008 16:22:39 GMT
nah punks always been relevent i think, theres always great punk bands, whether these in the public eye or not, but i do agree with you about the clash and the pistols.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fergal on Nov 9, 2008 18:19:44 GMT
nah punks always been relevent i think, theres always great punk bands, whether these in the public eye or not, but i do agree with you about the clash and the pistols. Ah right aye I'm on about British ones mostly, and the ones that were more in the public eye like SLF, the Damned, the Ruts, all those being examples of ones going stale when the punk scene was fizzling out, I'm sure there's a lot of great other punk music since then but I'm not switched on to a lot of it, particularly the American stuff |
|
|
|
Post by scruff on Nov 16, 2008 22:23:51 GMT
I hope you dont mind someone who got thrown off an Oasis board for being too aggressive then.
I think the middle class boy from Lincoln who lives with his mum took exception to me calling him a c**t on his own forum!
So I promise to behave and just write poems here!!
|
|
|
|
Post by cal on Nov 17, 2008 16:54:37 GMT
youve lost me now Scruff...
|
|
|
|
Post by scruff on Nov 17, 2008 18:33:27 GMT
I got me account deleted on an Oasis forum for calling the lad who runs it a c**t.
Truth must have hurt.
I thought it amusing as most Oasis fans behave like hooligans anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by upton on Nov 17, 2008 19:23:40 GMT
I'm an Oasis fan wouldn't say I was a Hooligan just a bit of a tw*t.
|
|
|
|
Post by funkymonkey on Jan 8, 2009 7:14:37 GMT
I like boys.
|
|
