|
|
Post by johnc81 on Apr 3, 2008 19:33:41 GMT
and it was a poxy 3 out of 5 stars. really bad review, basically says liam fray is the courteeners and that fallowfield is 'childish'. only really gives a decent account of not nineteen forever, Please Dont & Yesterday, Today.
But like all these shite magazines (yes, nme), the first half goes on about that there mancs, cocky singer called liam, street produced this album, etc etc
for fucks sake there proud of there roots and just get compared and damned for it
journalists are wankers
|
|
|
|
Post by toastedmonkey on Apr 3, 2008 20:10:32 GMT
meh, i hate how he has been pigeon-holed with liam gallagher.
I don't know if liam even likes oasis, everything ive read he talks about the smiths and the roses.
not heard him mention oasis.
|
|
|
|
Post by nickhaddow on Apr 5, 2008 9:06:56 GMT
Of course he likes Oasis.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cardinals of Langley on Apr 5, 2008 9:22:00 GMT
Not going to start another thread about what score the album was rated, so I thought I would write this here... St. jude got 1 star out of 5 in the guardian (http://arts.guardian.co.uk/filmandmusic/story/0,,2270708,00.html) and the Manchester Evening News gave it 4/5 - on a par with Orphan Boys' album. Personally, I couldn't really give a f*ck about what any "critic" says or doesnt say, its only one persons personal opinion, which more often not its utter bollocks for the sake of it being utter bollocks. So to summarise: f*ck The NME, f*ck Q Magazine, f*ck the Guardian. and f*ck anyone who doesn't have good taste, or the decency to admit they do. mieeow  |
|
|
|
Post by johnc81 on Apr 5, 2008 9:28:13 GMT
here here - magazines are too inconsistent.
well at least nuts, zoo, loaded, fhm and such admire the courteeners lol :-)
|
|
